Investigation into uint8_t and unsigned char Equivalence

The interplay between uint8_t and unsigned char in the realms of C and C has raised questions concerning their possible divergence. In particular, the concern arises when CHAR_BIT surpasses 8, rendering uint8_t incapable of being encapsulated within 8 bits.

Defining uint8_t Beyond unsigned char

Despite the char datatype's minimum bit representation of CHAR_BIT, uint8_t is not constrained to mirror unsigned char. Specifically, uint8_t can be declared as a distinct integer type that extends beyond unsigned char, embracing a size that exceeds 8 bits. This discrepancy stems from CHAR_BIT denoting the minimum bit allocation for any data type within a system, not explicitly limiting uint8_t's potential enlargement.

Preserving Bit Representation

However, regardless of any size distinction, uint8_t and unsigned char maintain identical bit representation on most systems. This conformity ensures that bit interpretations align, despite any underlying type differences. However, the exception arises when systems implement uint8_t as a non-character extended integer type. This divergence may lead to differing bit interpretations or orientations, altering the traditional bit sequencing.

Advantages of Extending uint8_t

Extending uint8_t beyond unsigned char offers potential advantages in certain scenarios. C's aliasing rules permit character types to indiscriminately alias any memory locations. This laxity hinders optimizations in functions involving both character pointers and type-specific pointers. However, by making uint8_t a distinct, non-character type, such aliasing restrictions are lifted. This distinction enables the compiler to confidently assume that objects of type uint8_t and other types, such as int, cannot overlap, facilitating more aggressive optimizations.