C 11 Thread-Safe Queue: Understanding and Debugging

You're encountering a segmentation fault in your thread-safe queue implementation within the dequeue() function, specifically when the queue is empty. This anomaly arises because your wait condition, wait_for(lock, timeout) is not properly structured to handle spurious wake-ups.

Understanding Spurious Wake-ups

Condition variables like populatedNotifier can experience spurious wake-ups, where they are awakened without any actual notification occurring. This behavior is inherent in the underlying multithreading implementation and can be unpredictable.

Correcting the Condition

To avoid relying on potentially unreliable notifications, best practice dictates using the inverse of the desired condition as the basis for your while loop in dequeue() and similar functions: while (!condition). Within this loop:

1. Guard the Condition: Acquire a unique lock (via std::unique_lock) to protect the queue's data.
2. Check the Condition: Verify that the queue is empty (q.empty()).
3. Wait if Needed: If the queue is empty, release the lock and enter a wait on the condition variable.
4. Re-check the Condition: When the lock is reacquired, immediately re-check the condition to ensure it has changed.

Example Implementation

Here's a revised version of your dequeue() function:

std::unique_lock<:mutex> lock(qMutex);
while (q.empty()) {
    c.wait(lock);
    if (q.empty()) {  // Immediately check the condition again after acquiring the lock
        return std::string();
    }
}
std::string ret = q.front();
q.pop();
return ret;

By following these guidelines, you can ensure that your wait condition is robust and not susceptible to spurious wake-ups, effectively resolving your segmentation fault issue.