Max-Width vs. Min-Width: Understanding the Design Flow

In the realm of media queries, the choice between min-width and max-width can greatly impact the design flow and layout of a website. While min-width is commonly used, max-width also serves a valuable purpose in website development.

Understanding the Design Flow

The decision between min-width and max-width ultimately depends on the design approach being followed. Min-width is primarily associated with mobile-first design, where the default styles focus on mobile devices, and subsequent queries target larger screen sizes.

Conversely, max-width follows a desktop-first approach, assuming that larger devices are the primary design target, with queries being added to accommodate smaller screens.

Custom Navigation for Smaller Screens

When designing a custom navigation for devices with a width of 360px or less, both min-width and max-width can be used. If it's the only exception to the mobile-first design approach, a max-width query can be employed specifically for that screen size:

body {
  /* Default styles for mobile-first layout */
}

@media screen and (max-width: 360px) {
  /* Styles for devices with a width of 360px or less */
}

Alternatively, if this custom navigation is intended to be the baseline for all screen sizes, then the default styles in the body can be modified for wider screens:

body {
  /* Styles for screens with a width of 360px or less */
}

@media screen and (min-width: 361px) {
  /* Styles for screens with a width greater than 360px */
}

The choice between min-width and max-width should be guided by the overall design flow and the specific requirements of the website. Understanding the purpose and capabilities of each approach empowers designers to optimize the user experience across various devices.