Type Asserting a Slice of Interface Values

In programming, it's common to encounter situations where you need to type assert a slice of interface values. However, this can sometimes lead to errors. Let's delve into the reasons why asserting a slice of interface values may not always be feasible.

When attempting to type assert to a specific type, such as []Symbol, from a slice of interface values, []Node, as in the example provided:

args.([]Symbol)

You may encounter the following error:

invalid type assertion: args.([]Symbol) (non-interface type []Node on left)

This error arises because a slice, such as []Node, is not an interface type, unlike Node itself. A slice possesses its own distinct type with its own set of behaviors and methods. Therefore, it lacks the fluidity and adaptability of an interface, which allows the underlying type to change dynamically.

While it may seem convenient to treat a slice of interface values as an interface, it fundamentally violates the concept of typing. In the example above, the intention is to convert the slice args into a slice of Symbol values. However, since args is a slice of Node values, a straightforward type assertion cannot be performed.

To correctly handle this situation, you can utilize an alternative approach:

symbols := make([]Symbol, len(args))
for i, arg := range args { symbols[i] = arg.(Symbol) }

This code creates a new slice of Symbol values, symbols, and iterates over the args slice, converting each element to a Symbol using a type assertion. This manual conversion ensures that each element in the resulting slice conforms to the desired type, providing the desired functionality without the need for invalid type assertions.