In HTML, there are several ways to include a JavaScript file. I'll explain four different methods, their drawbacks, and finally, highlight the best approach.

1. in

In this approach while parsing code javascript file loaded first before html inside body and If the JavaScript tries to manipulate elements in the body that haven’t been parsed yet, it can lead to errors, as the HTML content hasn’t fully loaded.

This blocking behavior delays the parsing and rendering of the rest of the page, affecting performance and user experience.

2. in

In this approach, the HTML is fully parsed before the JavaScript is loaded and executed, preventing errors related to missing DOM elements. This approach is all good but since HTML parsing and JavaScript loading happen sequentially, it can take longer duration overall, as the two processes occur at different times

3. in

In this approach, we make the JavaScript asynchronous, so it doesn’t block the HTML from loading. Both HTML parsing and JavaScript loading happen in parallel. However, if the JavaScript executes before the HTML is fully parsed and js tries to manipulate html elements that haven’t loaded yet, it can cause errors.
Note: — this approach can save the time but by loading html ,js simultaneously but more vulnerable to error

4. in

This approach is similar to the third one, where both HTML parsing and JavaScript loading happen in parallel. However, even if the JavaScript loads first, the browser waits until the HTML is fully parsed before executing the script

Summary: Best Approach

The best way is usually to use:

Why:

• It doesn’t block the HTML parsing (non-blocking download).
• It ensures the script runs after the DOM is fully parsed, making it safer for manipulating DOM elements.
• It preserves script execution order if you have multiple deferred scripts.

In cases where the script is independent of DOM content (like tracking scripts or ads), you can use async for better performance.